What You Think

May 2, 2011 |Comments (95)

Does the death of Osama bin Laden to make "Mission accomplished" banner, true? Unfortunately, not. Unfortunately, the order of the day is attrition.

But this is one of the undisputed. Former President George w. Bush went into the wall, set the clip, which is intended to be used on it, and President Barack Obama pulled the trigger. Call it what you will-the latest in a series of events in an aggressive act, more than one of us, go to the back a thousand years ancient hatred, the avenging Saint gridlock, the continuing war on disk 11 for the control of the oil. Find your own peace.

However, when political life, at least we have civility may agree on one thing: the world is a better place for Shooting, the head of bin Laden and his body, dropping in the middle of the sea. Kinetic bipartisanship? I'll take it.

For those who are sure bin Laden's forces broke up as a Martyr? It is okay. It is what freedom is about. You say tomato; I say criminal sympathizer. Pass the salt, and bullets.

Dan Wisniewski
Milwaukee

Former New York resident and experienced tragedy on disk 11 I think grateful today.

I am grateful for the notorious symbol of the terror of death. I am grateful to our well-funded and-trained military and intelligence apparatus.

I am grateful to our anticipation and the founding of the first amendment. I am grateful to live in the country, which has a deep respect for the rule of law.

I am grateful we have set for us, the value of all the members of the education of the society. I am grateful that we have made good progress along the huge strides forward towards the equal rights of our citizens and to transfer it, anger, and ignorance contribute to the further. I am grateful that we have the women and their.

Now I hope that we can continue to use us as an appropriate analogue country for the common good of the General will of the citizens and the proper use of security equipment exports, what makes America great.

Andrew R. Oliver
Whitefish Bay

The Royal Wedding as watched the idea in my mind that played on Friday, we had some national unifier of the Americans, such as the British back to the Royals.

Then on Sunday evening, the news that American special forces had killed Osama bin Laden. Hours after the celebrants crowds appeared in New York and Washington, D.C.

We had our presentation of the event. Maybe not in the context of the glorious cause, such as, but the national rejoicing, however, for the wedding.

Linda S. Parker
Oconomowoc

I think you cannot put Osama bin Laden at a rate of one good reason. I am sure that now is the question of whether it was really bin Laden or impostor, who was killed.

Ed Klein
Brookfield

It is important to set directly the community columnist Sherry Schultz in his April 19 column about our sources of energy in power stations, environmental considerations, the arguments concerning the documents.

Pleasant Prairie power plant steam Plume is comparable to the radioactive cloud from the nuclear disaster, the opposition has only one statement that misrepresents outrageous electricity production, renewable energy that allows us to serve more than one million customers in the current state of the environment of Wisconsin.

Fact: in the air a pleasant Prairie power plant, quality assurance, reduce the more than 85% of nitrogen oxide and particulate matter (PM) to collect more than 99,9% to 95% of the sulphur dioxide and over 90% of the mercury.

Fact: about 85% of our coal production capacity either has or will have out-of-the-art emission control technology.

Fact: at the end of 2012, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions from all energy sources in the electric generation is reduced by more than 80% compared to 2000.

A rational approach to our current and future energy needs requires careful and thoughtful analysis of the facts is FALSE and misleading-such as those at issue in the present Schultz n in the column.

Barry McNulty
External Communications Manager, we energies
Milwaukee

Randy Klingelhoets 25. April letters questioned why we promote energy sources. In short we have found the most cost effective way of advertising is important information to share with our customers. As a matter of fact, the cost of the customer on the basis of the radio advertising is the most cost-effective communication vehicle, among many, that we use.

And because customers routinely ask (and waits) for us to provide information about energy efficiency, electricity and natural gas safety, Billing settings, we keep costs down and how we design the future energy needs, always looking for information about effectively communicating with.

How does this affect the price you pay for energy? Very little. Wisconsin Public Service Commission allows only the cost of advertising in the US, which, in particular, to promote the security of the electricity and natural gas, to encourage energy conservation or in advertising, which is ordered by the Commission itself. The amount is about 1/100th per cent per year per customer, because the majority of our advertising costs be recovered through the rates customers pay for electricity and natural gas.

We believe that these costs should be in our company and our stockholders, not our responsibility.

Rick White
The Deputy Executive Director
Communications
We are energy sources